De una psicología social basada en la novedad y la reputación a una psicología social basada en la réplica acumulativa: implicaciones para la investigación e intervención en psicología social de la salud ##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar## PDF Publicado ene 21, 2026 DOI https://doi.org/10.25074/07198051.45.3135 ##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main## Darío Paéz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-6037 Silvia da Costa Universidad de Zaragoza ##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details## Número Núm. 45 (2025): Psicología Política Iberoamericana en Tiempos de Incertidumbre: Estallidos Sociales, Pandemias y Avances Conservadores Sección Artículos Tema Central Cómo citar Paéz, D., & da Costa, S. (2026). De una psicología social basada en la novedad y la reputación a una psicología social basada en la réplica acumulativa: implicaciones para la investigación e intervención en psicología social de la salud. Castalia - Revista De Psicología De La Academia, (45), 157-189. https://doi.org/10.25074/07198051.45.3135 Formatos de citación ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver estadisticas Descargas La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible. Citas Referencias REFERENCIAS Aberson, C. L., Healy, M. y Romero, V. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_04 Asch, S. (1952/1972). Psicología social. Eudeba Bakker, M., van Dijk, A. y Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060 Balliet, D., Wu, J. y De Dreu, C. K. W. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556-1581. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037737 Bickerdike, L., Booth, A., Wilson, P. M., Farley, K. y Wright, K. (2017). Social prescribing: Less rhetoric and more reality: A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open, 7, e013384. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384 Bierwiaczonek, K. y Kunst, J. R. (2021). Revisiting the integration hypothesis: Correlational and longitudinal meta-analyses demonstrate the limited role of acculturation for cross-cultural adaptation. Psychological Science, 32(9), 1476-1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211006432 Bond, R. y Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111 Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K. y Field, J. G. (2015). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038047 Brance, K., Chatzimpyros, V. y Bentall, R. P. (2023). Increased social identification is linked with lower depressive and anxiety symptoms among ethnic minorities and migrants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 99, 102216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102216 Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513 Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., Altmejd, A., Buttrick, N., Chan, T., Chen, Y., Forsell, E., Gampa, A., Heikensten, E., Hummer, L., Imai, T., Isaksson, S., Manfredi, D., Rose, J., Wagenmakers, E. J. y Wu, H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. y Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363-1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383437 Centeno-Leyva, S. y Dominguez-Lara, S. (2020). Replicability in psychological research: A reflection. Interacciones, 6(3), e172. https://doi.org/10.24016/2020.v6n3.172 Cignac, G. E. y Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069 Codol, J. P. (1975). On the so-called ‘superior conformity of the self’ behavior: Twenty experimental investigations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(4), 457-501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420050404 Cuddy, A. J. C., Schultz, S. J. y Fosse, N. E. (2018). P-curving a more comprehensive body of research on postural feedback reveals clear evidential value for power-posing effects: Reply to Simmons and Simonsohn (2017). Psychological Science, 29(4), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617746749 Cusi, O., Alfaro-Beracoechea, L., Sánchez, M., and Alonso-Arbiol, I. (2022). Frecuencia de participación en encuentros colectivos, sincronía emocional percibida y emociones de trascendencia en una muestra de jóvenes de México. Revista De Psicología, 18(36), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.46553/RPSI.18.36.2022.p27-46 Doise, W.y Valentim, J.P. (2015) Levels of Analysis in Social Psychology. Wright. J. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd Edition, pp. 900-904). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24032-4. Dufner, M., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C. y Denissen, J. J. A. (2018). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(1), 48-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318756467 Elkjær, E., Mikkelsen, M. B., Michalak, J., Mennin, D. S. y O’Toole, M. S. (2020). Expansive and contractive postures and movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of motor displays on affective and behavioral responses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 276-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619866261 Elliott, M. L., Knodt, A. R., Ireland, D., Morris, M. L., Poulton, R., Ramrakha, S., Sison, M. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A. y Hariri, A. R. (2020). What is the test-retest reliability of common task-functional MRI measures?: New empirical evidence and a meta--analysis. Psychological Science, 31(7), 792-806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916786 Franco, A., Malhotra, N. y Simonovits, G. (2016). Underreporting in psychology experiments: Evidence from a study registry. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615598377 Fox, N. W., Honeycutt, N. y Jussim, L. (2019). How many psychologists use questionable research practices: Estimating the population size of current QRP users. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3v7hx Galicia-Hernandez, T., Alonso, I. y Páez, D. (2025). Capital social, salud mental y bienestar en población migrante: Un metaanálisis. Revista de Psicología, 43(2), 815-852. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202502.007 García-Garzón, E., Lecuona, Ó. y Carbajal, G. V. (2018). Estudios de replicación, pre-registros y ciencia abierta en psicología. Apuntes de Psicología, 36(1-2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.55414/ap.v36i1-2.713 Genschow, O., Westfal, M., Crusius, J., Bartosch, L., Feikes, K. I., Pallasch, N. y Wozniak, M. (2021). Does social psychology persist over half a century?: A direct replication of Cialdini et al.’s (1975) classic door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), e1-e7. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000261 Gignac, G. E. y Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069 Giner-Sorolla, R. (2025). Changing practices and priorities in social psychological research methods and reporting. En D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, E. J. Finkel y W. B. Mendes (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Situational Press, Princeton. Grigoryev, D., Berry, J. W., Stogianni, M., Nguyen, A.-M. D., Bender, M. y Benet-Martínez, V. (2023). The integration hypothesis: A critical evaluation informed by multilevel meta-analyses of three multinational datasets. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 97, 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101897 Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T. y Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352 Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B. y Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 Hu, T., Zhang, D. y Yang, J. (2015). The relationship between attributional style for negative outcomes and depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(4), 304-321. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.4.304 Huang, C. (2015). Relation between attributional style and subsequent depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(6), 721-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9700-x Hummel, D. y Maedche, A. (2019). How Effective is Nudging? A Quantitative Review on the Effect Sizes and Limits of Empirical Nudging Studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005 Kellezi, B., Wakefield, J. R. H., Stevenson, C., McNamara, N., Mair, E., Bowe, M., Wilson, I. y Halder, M. M. (2019). The social cure of social prescribing: A mixed-methods study on the benefits of social connectedness on quality and effectiveness of care provision. BMJ Open, 9, e033137. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033137 Kvarven, A., Strømland, E. y Johannesson, M. (2020). Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects. Nature Human Behavior, 4(4), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0787-z Laws, K. (2016). Psychology, replication and below. BMC Psychology, 4(30). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0135-2 Linden, A. H. y Hönekopp, J. (2021). Heterogeneity of research results: A new perspective from which to assess and promote progress in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(2), 358-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620964193 Loncar, T. (2021). A decade of power posing: Where do we stand? The Psychologist, 8 de junio. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/decade-power-posing-where-do-we-stand Lovakov, A. y Agadullin, E. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752 Malle, B. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 895-919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895 McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J. y Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.521684 Mullen, B., Atkins, J. L., Champion, D. S., Edwards, C., Hardy, D., Story, J. E. y Vanderklok, M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(3), 262-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90020-4 Mullen, B., Brown, R. y Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 103-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220202 Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. y Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 Nguyen, A.-M. D y Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 122-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111435097 Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 Oyanedel, J. C. y Páez, D. (2020). Editorial: Social belongingness and well-being: International perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 603091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603091 Páez, D. (1986). Factores psicosociales y salud mental. Fundamentos. Páez, D. (2023). Prefacio. En A. R. R. Torres, M. E. O. Lima, E. M. Techio y L. Camino (Eds.), Psicología social: Temas e teorías .(pp.13-17). Blücher. Pinquart, M. y Sorensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15(2), 187-224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187 Pizarro, J. J., Zumeta, L., Bouchat, P., Wlodarczyk, A., Rimé, B., Basabe, N., Amutio, A. y Páez, D. (2022). Emotional Processes, Collective Behavior and Social Movements: A Meta-Analytic Review of Collective Effervescence Outcomes during Collective Gatherings and Demonstrations. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 974683. https://www.doi.org.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974683. Postmes, T., Wichmann, L. J., van Valkengoed, A. M., y van der Hoef, H. (2018). Social identification and depression: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2562 Presson, P. K. y Benassi, V. A. (1996). Illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(3), 493-510. Ranehill, E., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Leiberg, S., Sul, S. y Weber, R. A. (2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26(5), 653-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553946 Richard, F. D., Bond Jr., C. F. y Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331-363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 Rivera, L. M., Vu, H. A. y Backstrom, V. L. (2024). Self-esteem, ingroup favoritism, and outgroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(7), 1569-1588. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231210496 Rosenthal, R. (2005a). Binomial effect size display. En B. S. Everitt y D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa050 Rosenthal, R. (2005b). Binomial effect size display. Statistical Science, 20(4), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa050 Rosenthal, R. y Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill. Scheel, A. M., Schijen, M. R. M. J. y Lakens, D. (2021). An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard psychology literature with registered reports. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467 Schmidt, F. L. y Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage. Schwarzer, R. y Leppin, A. (1989). Social support and health: A meta-analysis. Psychology & Health, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870448908400361 Schwarzer, R. y Leppin, A. (1991). Social support and health: A theoretical and empirical overview. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407591081005 Sedikides, C. (2023). Self-enhancement and physical health: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12577 Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Montanaro, E., Avishai-Yitshak, A., Bryan, A., Klein, W. M. P., Miles, E. y Rothman, A. J. (2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1178-1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000387 Shrout, P. E. y Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 4(69), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. y Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 Simmons, J. P. y Simonsohn, U. (2017). Power posing: P-curving the evidence. Psychological Science, 28(5), 687-693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616658563 Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D. y Simmons, J. P. (2104). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives of Psychological Science, 6, 666-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988 Smith, T. B. y Silva, L. (2011). Ethnic identity and well-being of people of color: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021528 Stanley, T. D., Carter, E. C. y Doucouliagos, H. (2018). What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1325-1346. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000169 Stefan, S. y David, D. (2013). Recent developments in the experimental investigation of the illusion of control: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01004.x Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Schuh, S. C., Jetten, J. y van Dick, R. (2016). A meta-analytic review of social identification and health in organizational contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(4), 335-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316656701 Steffens, N. K., LaRue, C. J., Haslam, C., Walter, Z. C., Cruwys, T., Munt, K. A., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J. y Tarrant, M. (2021). Social identification-building interventions to improve health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 15(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481 Świątkowski, W. y Dompnier, B. (2017). Replicability crisis in social psychology: Looking at the past to find new pathways for the future. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.66 Sun, Y., Pan, Z. y Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x The Lancet (2025). Editorial: Social prescribing: Bringing community back to health? 406, 10499, 103-202. Social prescribing: bringing community back to health? - The Lancet Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. y Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Uscinski, J., Enders, A., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Drochon, H., Premaratne, K. y Murthi, M. (2022). Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time? PLoS ONE, 17(7), e0270429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270429 Weinstein, N. D. (1983). Reducing unrealistic optimism about illness susceptibility. Health Psychology, 2(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.2.1.11 Wikipedia (s.f.). Sesgo de correspondencia. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sesgo_de_correspondencia Yeager, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Visser, P. S., Holbrook, A. L. y Tahk, A. M. (2019). Mo-deration of classic social psychological effects by demographics in the U.S.adult population: New opportunities for theoretical advancement .Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), e84-e99. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000171. Yzerbit, V. y Klein, O. (2023). Psychologie sociale. De Boeck Supérieur. Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Sedikides, C. y Alicke, M. D. (2020). The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000218 Resumen Este texto ofrece una revisión constructiva de los problemas de validez interna, estadística y conceptual que afectan a la psicología social anglosajona predominante. La revisión se basa en un enfoque empírico que sintetiza los hallazgos de estudios previos para proporcionar al lector una comprensión realista de la relevancia y las limitaciones de la disciplina. Para ello, se utilizan y comentan metaanálisis, los cuales integran todos los estudios sobre un área determinada para estimar un efecto medio o tendencia central, evaluar su variabilidad y analizar los moderadores que explican dicha variabilidad. A partir de estos hallazgos, se plantean directrices para avanzar hacia una psicología social basada en la réplica acumulativa con el fin de reforzar una visión realista de los fenómenos psicosociales, así como la validez interna, externa y transcultural y la potencia estadística de nuestra disciplina. Palabras clave Crisis de replicabilidad Metaanálisis Tamaño del efecto Psicología Social
