Social identity and polarisation on social media around the satire of power regarding Chilean police violence Article Sidebar PDF (Español (España)) Published Jan 28, 2026 DOI https://doi.org/10.25074/07198051.45.3001 Main Article Content Pablo Alcota Universidad del Bío-Bío https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2824-8492 Article Details Issue No 45 (2025): Psicología Política Iberoamericana en Tiempos de Incertidumbre: Estallidos Sociales, Pandemias y Avances Conservadores Section Artículos Tema Central How to Cite Alcota, P. (2026). Social identity and polarisation on social media around the satire of power regarding Chilean police violence. Castalia - Revista De Psicología De La Academia, (45), 87-111. https://doi.org/10.25074/07198051.45.3001 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver estadisticas Downloads Download data is not yet available. Abstract The aim of this study is to understand the construction of social identities on social media in a context of strong inequality, through discourse analysis of the satire of power. This satire referes to acts of violence committed by the Chilean police. This research explored 1,303 comments associated with police satire videos shared on social media, which together formed a textual corpus for the analysis of these discourses. These comments were published on a popular digital platform between 2019 and 2024. The discourse analysis was conducted using a critical approach. Results suggest that the discourses comprise four main analytical dimensions: (1) identity in resistance, (2) conservative identity, (3) identity in fiction, and (4) Latin American identities. It is concluded that there are discourses on social media that contribute to the construction of social identities that denounce acts of violence carried out by State agents, allowing the establishment of a common narrative that constructs identity, nevertheless, it is also possible to observe dynamics linked to polarisation processes in other groups which reaffirm violence and authoritarian regimes.